A New Dawn for American Health: How Trump & RFK Jr. are Restoring Sovereignty and Science | The Truth About Cancer

For over two decades, we have tirelessly advocated for two foundational pillars of true health freedom: nutritious, unadulterated food and a rational, risk-aware vaccine schedule. We often wondered if meaningful, systemic change was possible against the entrenched powers of Big Pharma and Big Agra. Today, thanks to the decisive leadership of President Donald J. Trump, that change is not just possible—it is the official policy of the United States government. By appointing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services and giving him a clear mandate to dismantle the deep-state bureaucracy, President Trump has turned our long-held principles into national action. 😊

While other administrations talked about “draining the swamp,” when it comes to these two pillars, President Trump is authorizing the machinery to do it, and the Trump-Kennedy partnership is waging a decisive, domestic campaign for the sovereignty of the American body. Where past leaders turned a blind eye to corporate capture, this administration is seizing the moment to liberate our children’s bodies and our families’ plates. This is more than reform; it is a peaceful revolution in public health, made possible by a President who understands that true national strength begins with the health of its people.

The Real Food Pyramid: Reclaiming Our Nutritional Heritage

For generations, the USDA’s food pyramid stood as a monument to misguided science and Big Agra influence, promoting processed grains and sugars that fueled a pandemic of diabetesobesity, and heart disease. Secretary Kennedy, in one of his first major acts, dismantled this corrupt edifice and introduced the Real Food Pyramid.

As you can see from the image above, taken from RealFood.gov, the previous food pyramid was upside down! RFK just turned it right side up! 😊  The new guidelines emphasize eating real food, defined as minimally processed foods “prepared with few ingredients and without added sugars, industrial oils, artificial flavors, or preservatives.”

This isn’t a minor adjustment; it’s a philosophical renaissance. What has been announced is nothing less than the structural and symbolic flipping of the pyramid. For decades, this inverted logic was an instrument of captured interests, placing refined carbohydrates at the base, labeling industrial seed oils as “heart healthy,” and pushing protein and traditional fats to the margins.

This created a vicious economic flywheel: weaponized food → metabolic dysfunction → chronic disease → sick-care dependency → lifelong pharmaceutical drugs to manage symptoms. Basically, a closed loop of profit and sickness.

The new pyramid emphasizes:

  • Whole, nutrient-dense foods from regenerative and organic agriculture.
  • Healthy, ancestral fats over industrially processed seed oils.
  • Protein quality, prioritizing pasture-raised and wild-caught sources.

By flipping the pyramid, this administration is breaking a control architecture that has quietly governed public health for half a century. It is centering the foods humanity has always (until recently) eaten: high-quality protein, natural fats (including traditionally demonized saturated fats), and whole foods in their intact forms. It is finally displacing the industrial seed oils, ultra-processed carbohydrates, and food-like substances engineered for addiction and profit.

This isn’t nostalgia; it’s biological realism. Human physiology thrives on nutrient density and fats that stabilize our biology, and food itself contains gene-regulatory exosomes that literally “talk” to our cells. This correction interrupts the very feedback loop that feeds both the chronic disease epidemic and the drug industries built to manage it. When you flip the pyramid, you don’t just change what people eat—you change who benefits.

Eat Real Food

This policy directly aligns with the principles we’ve championed for years: that food is medicine, and that a corrupted food supply is a primary driver of chronic disease. At a White House press briefing, Kennedy called the changes the “most significant reset of federal nutrition policy in history.”

Share The Truth About Cancer

Kennedy said: “These guidelines replace corporate-driven assumptions with common-sense goals and gold-standard scientific integrity. These new guidelines will revolutionize our nation’s food culture and make America healthy again… For decades, Americans have grown sicker while healthcare costs have soared. The reason is clear: the hard truth is that our government has been lying to us to protect corporate profit-taking, telling us that these food-like substances were beneficial to public health… Federal policy promoted and subsidized highly processed foods and refined carbohydrates and turned a blind eye to the disastrous consequences. Today, the lies stop.”

This historic shift is being translated into operational reality across the government, including the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and military health services. You cannot sustain national security, readiness, or operational capacity on ultra-processed food. A nation cannot be strong if those sworn to defend it are metabolically compromised. This is what it looks like when policy confronts the chronic disease epidemic at its root.

Kennedy’s move boldly rejects the lobbyist playbook and realigns federal policy with peer-reviewed science on metabolic health. This is a victory for every family farmer, every conscious consumer, and every parent seeking to nourish their children properly, a sentiment echoed in discussions of his broader plan to combat childhood chronic diseases.

A guideline is a blueprint. The real work is implementation: federal procurement shifting toward real food, school lunch reform accelerating, and medical institutions being forced by evidence to catch up. This is the beginning of a national reorientation away from symptom-management and toward true prevention. We now have a historic invitation: to eat real food, support the farmers who steward life, and build meals that restore metabolism and resilience. The tide is turning.

Restoring Sanity and Safety to Childhood Vaccines

For decades, the U.S. childhood immunization schedule has been presented not as a set of clinical recommendations, but as a non-negotiable mandate. This rigid, “one-size-fits-all” model was predicated on a flawed premise: that public health is best served by removing physician judgment and patient context from the equation. The truth is that this system was corrupted by perverse financial incentives that placed profit above individual care.

Previously, pediatricians were financially incentivized to meet aggressive vaccination quotas. Initiatives like the “Combo 10” benchmark—where practices received bonuses of $400 per child from insurers like Blue Cross Blue Shield for achieving a 63% vaccination rate across their entire patient base—transformed doctors from caregivers into commission-driven sales agents. Below is a video of RFK, Jr. and Dr. Sherri Tenpenny from our 2023 docu-series – REMEDY – elaborating on this topic.

These coercive pay-for-performance schemes are now being systematically dismantled by Kennedy’s HHS, which has directed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to end financial incentives tied solely to vaccination rates.

The message was clear: the system valued blanket compliance over careful, individualized medical evaluation. As Kennedy stated on video in 2025, “Doctors are being paid to vaccinate, not to evaluate. They’re pressured to follow the money, not the science.”

The reforms enacted in January 2026 under the leadership of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at the CDC represent a historic correction. This was not a reckless reduction but a scientifically grounded restoration of medical ethics. The schedule was revised from a bloated 18 universally recommended doses down to a core 11, moving vaccines for influenza, rotavirus, hepatitis A, and certain meningitis strains into a category of “shared clinical decision-making.” This shift explicitly gives parents a meaningful say in whether their child receives certain vaccines, requiring a conversation about risks and benefits rather than an automatic administration.

This long-overdue correction is grounded in a foundational, yet inconvenient, epidemiological truth: population risk is heterogeneous, not homogeneous. The reformed schedule finally moves away from the pseudoscientific, assembly-line model of medicine and toward a risk-stratified approach. It restores the physician’s role by empowering them to utilize clinical discretion—considering a child’s individual immune status, genetic predispositions, and actual environmental risk—rather than functioning as a rubber stamp for a coercive, profit-maximizing protocol. Re-categorizing vaccines for pathogens like COVID-19, RSV, and Hepatitis B to “high-risk only” status isn’t a reduction in care; it’s the precise application of medicine, reserving medical interventions for those who actually stand to benefit from them. This is how science is supposed to work, outside the boardrooms of pharmaceutical manufacturers.

The subsequent exodus of career bureaucrats from the CDC is not brain drain; it’s a parasite purge. Their resignations are a de facto admission that the agency’s old operating principle—serving as a marketing arm for Big Pharma—is no longer tenable. Good riddance. The institution can now be rebuilt on the pillars it long ago abandoned: rigorous, hypothesis-driven science, transparent and quantifiable risk-benefit disclosures, and the non-negotiable ethical standard of informed consent.

This reform exposes the central, vacuous mantra of the pro-mandate lobby. We are incessantly lectured by those with a vested financial or ideological interest—often with the scientific depth of a cable news chyron—that “vaccines save millions of lives and eradicate disease.” One such devotee of this faith-based immunology was Senator Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), whose simplistic pronouncements on the matter Kennedy dismantled with factual precision in a rebuttal that should be mandatory viewing.

The historical data, curiously absent from their talking points, undermines their entire narrative. Consider the CDC’s own investment in truth: a study funded by the CDC and conducted by researchers at Johns Hopkins analyzed a century of U.S. mortality data. Its conclusion was empirically clear and devastating to the salvation myth of vaccination: nearly 90% of the decline in mortality from common infectious diseases occurred before the introduction of their corresponding vaccines.

The dramatic reduction was attributable to improved sanitation, nutrition, and living standards—facts the “vaccines or death” evangelists conveniently ignore. The 2026 reforms finally begin to align policy with this uncontested historical record, prioritizing real public health over pharmaceutical evangelism.

Transformative, Decisive Leadership

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is demonstrating what transformative leadership looks like, and he is doing so with the essential backing of a President willing to break the old molds. President Trump, by supporting this agenda, has taken the very issues patriots have long held sacred—medical freedom, environmental purity, and untainted food—and created the political space for them to become national policy. This is not partisan politics; it is the restoration of foundational American values: liberty, informed consent, and sovereignty over our own bodies.

These historic accomplishments, made possible under this administration, provide a tangible, powerful reason for hope. They are a blueprint for a stronger, healthier, and more independent America. This is the work we voted for. This is the promise of “America First” applied to the most personal frontier of all: our health. Let us celebrate these victories, support the courageous leaders making them possible, and continue this essential journey toward reclaiming our nation’s vitality from the ground up.

Source: The Truth About Cancer Website

Missouri voters reject key provision of health care law | My Way News

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) – Missouri voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected a key provision of President Barack Obama’s health care law, sending a clear message of discontent to Washington and Democrats less than 100 days before the midterm elections.

About 71 percent of Missouri voters backed a ballot measure, Proposition C, that would prohibit the government from requiring people to have health insurance or from penalizing them for not having it.

The Missouri law conflicts with a federal requirement that most people have health insurance or face penalties starting in 2014.

Tuesday’s vote was seen as largely symbolic because federal law generally trumps state law. But it was also seen as a sign of growing voter disillusionment with federal policies and a show of strength by conservatives and the tea party movement.

“To us, it symbolized everything,” said Annette Read, a tea party participant from suburban St. Louis who quit her online retail job to lead a yearlong campaign for the Missouri ballot measure. “The entire frustration in the country … how our government has misspent, how they haven’t listened to the people, this measure in general encompassed all of that.”

Missouri’s ballot also featured primaries for U.S. Senate, Congress and numerous state legislative seats. But at many polling places, voters said they were most passionate about the health insurance referendum.

“I believe that the general public has been duped about the benefits of the health care proposal,” said Mike Sampson of Jefferson City, an independent emergency management contractor, who voted for the proposition. “My guess is federal law will in fact supersede state law, but we need to send a message to the folks in Washington, D.C., that people in the hinterlands are not happy.” Read more…

Superstar CBS Reporter Blows the Lid Off the Swine Flu Media Hype and Hysteria | Mercola.com

Sharyl Attkisson is a CBS News correspondent and investigative reporter. She’s covered Capitol Hill since February 2006 and has been a Washington-based correspondent there since January 1995. She was also part of the CBS news team that received the Edward Murrow Award in 2005 for overall excellence. Additionally, she received an Outstanding Investigative Journalism Emmy in 2002 for a series on the Red Cross.

In case you didn’t realize it, Sharyl Attkisson is the investigative reporter behind the groundbreaking CBS News study that found H1N1 flu cases are NOT as prevalent as feared.

In fact, they’re barely on the radar screen.

How did this startling information come about, and why is the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) painting a different picture entirely? I spoke directly with Sharyl Attkisson to find out.

Two Videos

The first video is an amazing interview I did with Sharyl about ten days ago and what the bulk of this article is based on.

The second video is brand new and was done at noon yesterday in which I was videoed in the CBS studio in downtown Chicago. Sharyl was gracious enough to invite me to be on with Dr. Bernadine Healy, the former director of the NIH. We both were in agreement about the swine flu and opposed to the stance the CDC is taking, but we had different views on mammograms.

Please also watch the second interview as it is very entertaining.

Getting Started on the Swine Flu Trail

Ms. Attkisson says:

“The reason I looked into this is a couple of months ago, I got tips from three or four different segments of public healthcare, with folks telling me the CDC has recommended that they go ahead and stop testing for and counting swine flu cases.

Each different entity that contacted me was concerned, thinking that this should not be happening. They really felt that it was necessary for the swine flu to continue to be tracked in some details. So I went about trying to find out why this decision was made and what the ramifications would be.

… I started by contacting the CDC and the HHS and asking some basic questions. I felt like I pretty much got stonewalled with some of the information I really needed to get at, especially what I needed from the states data, and information on the rationale behind this decision to stop counting and testing for swine flu.”

Because the CDC did not initially respond to Attkisson’s requests, she contacted all 50 states directly, asking for their statistics on state lab-confirmed H1N1 prior to the halt of individual testing and counting in July. She also asked states, one by one, to help explain the rationale behind the CDC’s decision to stop tracking H1N1 cases.

Attkisson continues:

“One of my good sources within the government said to me that they’re either trying to, in his opinion, over-represent the swine flu numbers or under-represent by not counting them anymore. He said, “You need to find out which it is.” And so to find out which it might be, I really wanted to see the data that the CDC had at the time it made the decision to quit counting the cases.”

What Her Investigative Report Reveals

If you listen to most media outlets and even to government agencies, you get the impression that virtually every person who has visited their physician with flu-like symptoms in recent months has H1N1, with no testing necessary because, after all, there’s an epidemic.

We are all being led to believe that every case diagnosed as “swine flu” or even as “flu-like illness” is, in fact, swine flu.

But Attkisson’s investigation revealed a very different picture right from her first contact with individual states. She explains:

“Across the country, state by state, they were testing [for H1N1] until CDC told them not to bother. They were testing, in general, the cases most likely to be believed to have been swine flu based on a doctor’s diagnosis of symptoms and risk factors such as travel to Mexico.

These special cases were going to state labs for absolute confirmation with the best test — not the so-called ‘rapid testing,’ but the real confirmation test.

Of those presumed likely swine flu cases out of approximately every hundred of what was tested, only a small fraction were actually swine flu. In every instance, perhaps the biggest number of cases that were swine flu was something like 30%. The smallest number was something like 2% or 3%.

Maybe there’s one state where it was just 1%.

The point is, of the vast majority of the presumed swine flu cases recognized by trained physicians, the vast majority were not flu at all. They weren’t swine flu or regular flu; they were some other sort of upper respiratory infection.

And here is the clincher that it seems the CDC just doesn’t want the American public to know …

The CDC explained that one of the reasons they quit counting was because of all the flu that’s out there, most are swine flu. Well, that’s true. Most of the flu that was out there was indeed swine flu, but they failed to say that most of the suspected flu was nothing at all. And I think that’s the caveat the public just didn’t know,” Attkisson explains.

She gives even more striking examples of the numbers the investigative report revealed. For instance:

  • In Florida, 83 percent of specimens that were presumed to be swine flu were negative for all flu when tested!
  • In California, 86 percent of suspected H1N1 specimens were not swine flu or any flu; only 2 percent were confirmed swine flu.
  • In Alaska, 93 percent of suspected swine flu specimens were negative for all flu types; only 1 percent was H1N1 flu.

Freedom of Information and Getting the Truth Out
It is not easy for journalists to access this type of information, and they often have to wait weeks, months or even years for information from the CDC and the FDA — information that is readily available and supposed to be clearly public.

Attkisson expands on the difficulties she faced in trying to get simple data regarding swine flu cases in the United States:

“They [CDC’s public affairs] quit communicating with me when I pressed on why I couldn’t get certain information. They just wouldn’t answer my emails anymore. So I had to file a Freedom of Information request, which is usually my last choice because I know I was going into a deep black hole many times and I’ll never get an answer.

But in this case, I got an interesting response on October 19 from the CDC when I had asked for some simple, public documents that would have been easy for them to obtain too quickly.

Journalists are allowed to ask for expedited processing of their Freedom of Information request because, for obvious reasons, they’re working on a story that may have public impact or be of public interest. The agencies are not supposed to use the Freedom of Information Law to obstruct or delay the release of this information.

This may be the first time I was denied that expedited processing from Freedom of Information that we’re entitled to as members of the press; a letter from HHS or Health and Human Services (the CDC is under HHS) said to me that one of the reasons they’re denying my expedited processing is because this is not a matter of ‘widespread and exceptional media or public interest.’

In other words, the CDC doesn’t think these questions about swine flu prevalence and these other things that we’ve been asking are, at least in their opinion in this letter, not a matter of widespread and exceptional media or public interest.”

Yet, while the CDC expressed that questions about swine flu prevalence were not a matter of widespread media or public interest, the President had declared the swine flu a national public health emergency!

The inconsistencies at the CDC are nearly incomprehensible.

The Ramifications of the Swine Flu Policy

According to Attkisson’s CBS News study, when you come down with chills, fever, cough, runny nose, malaise and all those other “flu-like” symptoms, the illness is likely caused by influenza at most 17 percent of the time and as little as 3 percent! The other 83 to 97 percent of the time it’s caused by other viruses or bacteria.

So remember that not every illness that appears to be the flu actually is the flu. In fact, most of the time it’s not.

Curiously, the CDC still advises those who were told they had 2009 H1N1 (and therefore should be immune to getting it again) to get vaccinated unless they had lab confirmation.

But because very few people have actually had a lab-confirmed case of H1N1 (and in most cases those people told they had swine flu probably did not), this means nearly everyone is still being advised to get the swine flu vaccine.

Attkisson has been one of the few to speak out against this flawed system and point out the serious ramifications that come when a public health agency is secretive about their health data.

Attkisson says:

“From a public and journalistic standpoint, I believe the mistake comes when you don’t fully disclose to the public as you go and discover the mistakes. Try to disclose and fix things that come up.

Everybody understands that there isn’t a perfect system, but I think you need to be upfront with them, explain what you’re doing, and explain what you’re discovering. If you’ve made a mistake or you feel like you need to correct something, say that, too, but don’t just try to keep information from the public.”

I couldn’t agree more, and Attkisson’s CBS News report has stood out like a bright light of truth among all the clouds of misinformation.

If you’d like to learn more about the report and its findings, you can read all the details in the past article CBS Reveals that Swine Flu Cases Seriously Overestimated.

Source: Mercola.com

Resources:
H1N1 Videos

Immunization H1N1 Vaccine Commentary | Liberty International

Be aware the H1N1 swine flu is being touted by government and health agencies worldwide as the next pandemic and are selling millions of vaccines.

In our opinion the fear of pandemic is being intentionally created without considering the side effects and possible health consequences of this and other vaccines which remain controversial at best.

Additionally, the nasal mist introducing a live virus which may make the receiver contagious if they breath or sneeze near others. Become informed!

You can view a few selected videos here and download a State of Oregon brochure and find out more about personal, religious or medical exemptions.

Nobody can force you or your child to take a vaccine!